{"id":8326,"date":"2026-03-25T23:10:49","date_gmt":"2026-03-25T23:10:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/push-notification-testing-framework\/"},"modified":"2026-03-25T23:10:49","modified_gmt":"2026-03-25T23:10:49","slug":"push-notification-testing-framework","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/push-notification-testing-framework\/","title":{"rendered":"Push Notification Testing Framework: What It Is, Key Features, Benefits, Use Cases, and How It Fits in Push Notification Marketing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is a structured way to plan, run, validate, and learn from tests across the entire push lifecycle\u2014copy, targeting, timing, delivery, deep links, and measurement. In Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>, push notifications are one of the fastest levers for reactivation and conversion, but they are also easy to misfire: the wrong audience, broken links, poor timing, or misleading results can damage trust quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>, speed often competes with rigor. A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> resolves that tension by standardizing how teams experiment and how they prevent errors before messages go live. The result is not \u201cmore tests,\u201d but better decisions\u2014grounded in clean data, controlled risk, and repeatable practices that scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Is Push Notification Testing Framework?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is a repeatable system for improving push notifications through controlled experiments and quality checks. For beginners, think of it as \u201cthe rules and tools your team uses to test push campaigns safely and scientifically.\u201d For experienced teams, it\u2019s a set of processes that unifies experimentation design, QA, segmentation validation, deliverability monitoring, and incremental measurement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The core concept is simple: push performance is influenced by many variables (message, audience, timing, frequency, device behavior), so you need a disciplined method to isolate what caused a result. Business-wise, a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> protects revenue and brand trust by reducing production mistakes and by prioritizing changes that deliver measurable lift.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>, it sits alongside email testing, landing page experimentation, and lifecycle optimization. Inside Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>, it becomes the backbone for safely iterating on personalization, automation, and triggered journeys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why Push Notification Testing Framework Matters in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Push notifications are interruptive by design. That makes them powerful for Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>, but also unforgiving: a single bad send can increase opt-outs or uninstalls. A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> matters because it turns push into an accountable channel rather than a \u201cspray-and-pray\u201d tactic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Strategically, it helps teams:\n– Prove what actually works (incremental lift) rather than what merely correlates with success.\n– Protect customer experience by preventing broken deep links, mismatched offers, and timing errors.\n– Improve retention outcomes, not just clicks\u2014reactivation, repeat purchases, and reduced churn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The business value is measurable: better conversion efficiency, fewer costly mistakes, and faster iteration cycles. In competitive Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>, the advantage often goes to teams that can test quickly and<\/em> accurately\u2014without inflating risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Push Notification Testing Framework Works<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is best understood as an operational workflow that connects hypotheses to outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Input \/ Trigger<\/strong>\n – A business goal (increase repeat purchases, reduce cart abandonment, drive content consumption).\n – A hypothesis (e.g., \u201cAdding urgency language will improve conversions for lapsed buyers\u201d).\n – A testable change (copy, send time, segmentation rule, frequency cap, rich media, deep link).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Analysis \/ Planning<\/strong>\n – Define primary and guardrail metrics (conversion rate plus opt-out\/uninstall thresholds).\n – Select a test method (A\/B, holdout, sequential testing, multivariate where feasible).\n – Determine sample size and duration based on expected traffic and variability.\n – Validate audience logic and eligibility rules (who can receive, who must be excluded).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Execution \/ Application<\/strong>\n – Build variants, assign groups, and randomize appropriately.\n – Run pre-send QA (rendering, link validation, personalization fallback, localization).\n – Monitor deliverability and device\/platform differences during the run.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    Output \/ Outcome<\/strong>\n – Read results with discipline (lift, confidence, segments where it worked, side effects).\n – Decide: ship, iterate, or stop.\n – Document learnings in a shared library so future campaigns start smarter.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    In Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>, this workflow creates institutional memory. In Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>, it prevents repeating the same mistakes under deadline pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Key Components of Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    A strong Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> typically includes these elements:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    1) Experiment design standards<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    • Hypothesis templates (what changes, for whom, and why).<\/li>\n
    • Clear definitions of success metrics and guardrails.<\/li>\n
    • Randomization and control-group rules (including holdouts for incremental lift).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      2) QA and validation processes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
        \n
      • Payload validation (title\/body length, character limits, emoji handling).<\/li>\n
      • Deep link verification and fallback routes.<\/li>\n
      • Personalization integrity checks (missing attributes, default values, stale data).<\/li>\n
      • Localization and time zone correctness.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

        3) Audience and data inputs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
          \n
        • Consent\/opt-in status, device tokens, platform version, app activity recency.<\/li>\n
        • Behavioral events (viewed product, added to cart, completed onboarding step).<\/li>\n
        • Customer attributes (plan type, lifecycle stage, region, language).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

          4) Measurement and governance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
            \n
          • Attribution rules (click-through vs view-through where supported).<\/li>\n
          • Incrementality approach (holdout groups, geo splits when appropriate).<\/li>\n
          • A decision process for shipping winners and retiring losers.<\/li>\n
          • Ownership across marketing, analytics, and engineering to avoid gaps.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

            This combination makes a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> practical rather than theoretical, especially in cross-functional Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Types of Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

            There aren\u2019t universally \u201cofficial\u201d types, but in practice teams use distinct approaches depending on maturity and risk tolerance:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            QA-first frameworks (quality and safety focused)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            Emphasize pre-send checks, payload validation, and controlled rollouts. This is common when push is high volume or brand-sensitive in Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Experimentation-first frameworks (optimization focused)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            Prioritize rapid A\/B testing, structured hypotheses, and a learning agenda. This approach is typical for growth-oriented Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Incrementality-first frameworks (causal impact focused)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            Use holdout groups and strict measurement to prove real lift (not just engaged-user bias). This is essential when push influences downstream revenue and retention metrics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Lifecycle\/journey frameworks (automation focused)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            Test not only individual notifications, but sequences: onboarding series, cart recovery flows, subscription renewal reminders. The framework evaluates how steps interact, not just single-message performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Many organizations blend these into one Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> that evolves as the channel grows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Real-World Examples of Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

            Example 1: Ecommerce replenishment reminders<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            A retailer uses Push Notification Marketing<\/strong> to remind customers to repurchase consumables. The Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> sets:\n– A holdout group to measure true incremental repurchase lift.\n– A\/B variants comparing \u201ctime since last purchase\u201d triggers vs \u201cpredicted runout\u201d triggers.\n– Guardrails for opt-outs and complaint signals to protect Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Outcome: fewer notifications, higher revenue per send, and lower unsubscribe rates because timing becomes more relevant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Example 2: Fintech onboarding activation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            A fintech app tests a multi-step onboarding journey. The framework checks:\n– Deep links to the correct setup screen per platform.\n– Personalization fallbacks when KYC status is unknown.\n– Sequence testing (day-1 vs day-3 prompts) with a primary metric of activation completion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Outcome: improved activation rate and reduced support tickets\u2014showing how a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> supports retention beyond clicks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Example 3: Publisher re-engagement for dormant users<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

            A media publisher wants to reduce churn for users inactive for 14+ days. Using a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong>, they:\n– Segment by historical content preference (sports, finance, entertainment).\n– Test send-time optimization versus editorial \u201cbreaking news\u201d triggers.\n– Monitor deliverability and notification fatigue through frequency caps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Outcome: better re-engagement with fewer sends\u2014an efficient win in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> and Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Benefits of Using Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

            A well-run Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> delivers benefits that compound over time:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n
            • Performance improvements:<\/strong> higher click-to-open quality, better conversion rate, increased repeat actions, and improved retention lift.<\/li>\n
            • Cost savings:<\/strong> fewer wasted sends, reduced engineering rework from broken links or payload issues, and fewer \u201cmake-good\u201d campaigns after mistakes.<\/li>\n
            • Operational efficiency:<\/strong> faster approvals, reusable test templates, and a clear path from hypothesis to rollout.<\/li>\n
            • Customer experience gains:<\/strong> fewer irrelevant interruptions, better personalization accuracy, and lower notification fatigue\u2014crucial for sustainable Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

              Challenges of Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              Implementing a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> comes with real constraints:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                \n
              • Measurement limitations:<\/strong> OS privacy changes, inconsistent view-through reporting, and biased attribution toward already-engaged users can mislead results.<\/li>\n
              • Small sample sizes:<\/strong> niche segments may not support statistically confident A\/B tests, pushing teams toward sequential testing or Bayesian approaches.<\/li>\n
              • Platform variability:<\/strong> Android and iOS handle delivery, grouping, and presentation differently; a \u201cwinner\u201d may not generalize.<\/li>\n
              • Data quality and identity issues:<\/strong> missing attributes, delayed event ingestion, and device-token churn can distort segmentation and outcomes.<\/li>\n
              • Organizational friction:<\/strong> marketing wants speed, analytics wants rigor, engineering wants stability. Without governance, the framework becomes either too slow or too loose.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                A mature Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> program treats these as design constraints, not reasons to avoid testing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Best Practices for Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                To make a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> reliable and scalable:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Design better tests<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                  \n
                • Write hypotheses that specify audience, change, expected direction, and business rationale.<\/li>\n
                • Prefer one primary metric per test (e.g., incremental purchase rate), plus 2\u20133 guardrails (opt-outs, uninstalls, complaint signals).<\/li>\n
                • Avoid overlapping tests on the same audience at the same time unless you have a plan for interaction effects.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                  Protect customer experience<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                    \n
                  • Use frequency caps and cooldown windows as standard operating procedure in Push Notification Marketing<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
                  • Stage rollouts: start with a small percentage, then expand if guardrails stay healthy.<\/li>\n
                  • Maintain a \u201cdo-not-disturb\u201d policy by time zone and user preference.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                    Improve measurement integrity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                      \n
                    • Use holdout groups for major changes (new triggers, new lifecycle journeys).<\/li>\n
                    • Document attribution windows and stick to them so results remain comparable over time.<\/li>\n
                    • Analyze by segment (new vs returning, high-value vs low-value), but avoid p-hacking by predefining cuts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                      Scale learning<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                        \n
                      • Build a centralized test log: what was tested, results, interpretation, and follow-up actions.<\/li>\n
                      • Turn repeated winners into standards (e.g., default deep link patterns, proven tone guidelines).<\/li>\n
                      • Review tests monthly to align with broader Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> goals, not vanity metrics.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                        Tools Used for Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                        A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is enabled by tool categories more than by any single product:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          \n
                        • Push delivery and orchestration systems:<\/strong> manage tokens, payloads, segmentation, scheduling, and triggered sends (core to Push Notification Marketing<\/strong> operations).<\/li>\n
                        • Product analytics tools:<\/strong> event tracking, funnel analysis, cohort retention, and experiment readouts.<\/li>\n
                        • Experimentation platforms or feature-flag systems:<\/strong> randomization, holdouts, and controlled rollouts\u2014especially useful when push interacts with in-app experiences.<\/li>\n
                        • CRM\/CDP systems:<\/strong> unify customer attributes, consent states, lifecycle stages, and channel preferences for Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
                        • Data warehouse + BI dashboards:<\/strong> consistent reporting, longer-term retention analysis, and unified ROI measurement.<\/li>\n
                        • QA and monitoring tooling:<\/strong> link checkers, payload validators, error logging, and alerting for delivery anomalies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                          The key is integration: the framework is only as strong as the consistency between targeting, sending, and measurement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          Metrics Related to Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                          To evaluate a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong>, track both campaign performance and testing quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          Core performance metrics (channel outcomes)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                            \n
                          • Delivery rate (sent vs delivered), token validity rates<\/li>\n
                          • Open rate \/ click rate (where applicable)<\/li>\n
                          • Conversion rate (purchase, signup completion, content read)<\/li>\n
                          • Revenue per notification, revenue per user reached<\/li>\n
                          • Retention lift (e.g., day-30 retention delta vs holdout)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                            Customer experience and brand guardrails<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                              \n
                            • Opt-out rate (notification permissions disabled)<\/li>\n
                            • Uninstall rate or app churn signals (where measurable)<\/li>\n
                            • Frequency and fatigue indicators (notifications per user per week, diminishing returns)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                              Experiment quality and efficiency metrics<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                \n
                              • Percentage of tests with pre-registered hypotheses and metrics<\/li>\n
                              • Time-to-learn (from idea to decision)<\/li>\n
                              • Share of tests using holdouts for material changes<\/li>\n
                              • Rate of inconclusive tests (helps tune sample sizes and test design)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                                In Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>, the best teams optimize for incremental business impact while keeping guardrails healthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                Future Trends of Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                Several trends are shaping how a Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> evolves in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  \n
                                • AI-assisted ideation with stricter governance:<\/strong> AI can generate copy variants and audience hypotheses, but frameworks will add stronger review, brand checks, and bias controls.<\/li>\n
                                • More automation in send-time and personalization:<\/strong> predictive timing and next-best-content models will require robust testing to confirm they outperform simpler rules.<\/li>\n
                                • Privacy-driven measurement shifts:<\/strong> more aggregated reporting and fewer user-level signals will increase reliance on holdouts, modeled lift, and careful experimental design.<\/li>\n
                                • Cross-channel orchestration:<\/strong> push will be tested as part of journeys with email, in-app messaging, and SMS\u2014moving from single-message optimization to system optimization.<\/li>\n
                                • Richer notification formats:<\/strong> interactive elements and richer layouts increase complexity, making pre-send QA and device coverage more central to Push Notification Marketing<\/strong> testing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                                  Push Notification Testing Framework vs Related Terms<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                  A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is often confused with adjacent concepts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  Push Notification Testing Framework vs A\/B testing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                  A\/B testing is one technique. A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> includes A\/B testing plus QA, governance, measurement standards, guardrails, and documentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  Push Notification Testing Framework vs notification QA<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                  Notification QA focuses on correctness\u2014links, formatting, personalization, and platform rendering. A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> includes QA but also covers experimentation design and incremental impact measurement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  Push Notification Testing Framework vs lifecycle\/journey optimization<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                  Lifecycle optimization is the strategy for improving onboarding, retention, and reactivation flows in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>. A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is the method for testing push components inside those flows and proving which changes drive results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                  Who Should Learn Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                  A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is valuable across roles:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    \n
                                  • Marketers:<\/strong> to improve results without increasing send volume and to run safer Push Notification Marketing<\/strong> programs.<\/li>\n
                                  • Analysts:<\/strong> to design clean experiments, avoid misleading attribution, and quantify incremental lift in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
                                  • Agencies:<\/strong> to deliver repeatable outcomes for multiple clients, with consistent QA and reporting standards.<\/li>\n
                                  • Business owners and founders:<\/strong> to reduce channel risk, protect brand trust, and allocate resources to changes that demonstrably move retention and revenue.<\/li>\n
                                  • Developers:<\/strong> to support reliable deep links, event instrumentation, and experimentation infrastructure that makes testing trustworthy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                                    Summary of Push Notification Testing Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                    A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is a structured, repeatable approach to testing push notifications that combines experimentation, QA, measurement, and governance. It matters because push is high-impact and high-risk: without rigor, Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> teams can optimize for misleading metrics or damage user trust through errors and fatigue. Implemented well, it strengthens Push Notification Marketing<\/strong> by improving relevance, proving incremental lift, and enabling faster iteration with fewer mistakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                    1) What is a Push Notification Testing Framework in simple terms?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                    A Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> is the set of rules, steps, and tools you use to test push notifications safely\u2014so you can improve performance while preventing mistakes like broken links, wrong audiences, or misleading results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    2) How is this different from just \u201ctesting copy\u201d?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                    Copy testing is only one layer. A full framework also tests targeting logic, timing, frequency caps, deep links, personalization fallbacks, and incremental impact\u2014core concerns in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    3) What\u2019s the minimum viable setup for Push Notification Marketing testing?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                    At minimum: a consistent hypothesis template, A\/B testing capability, a QA checklist (links, personalization, rendering), and a dashboard tracking conversion plus opt-out\/uninstall guardrails. This is enough to start a lightweight Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    4) Do I always need a holdout group?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                    Not always, but for big changes (new triggers, new journey steps, major audience expansions), holdouts are one of the best ways to prove incremental lift in Direct & Retention Marketing<\/strong> rather than counting conversions that would have happened anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    5) What metrics should I prioritize first?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                    Choose one primary metric tied to the goal (purchase, activation, retention) and a few guardrails (opt-outs, uninstalls, complaint signals). Click rate alone is rarely sufficient for responsible Push Notification Marketing<\/strong> decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                    6) Why do push tests sometimes \u201cwin\u201d but revenue doesn\u2019t improve?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                    Common causes include attribution bias (crediting conversions from already-engaged users), overlapping campaigns, seasonality, or short test windows. A stronger Push Notification Testing Framework<\/strong> addresses this with holdouts, clean randomization, and consistent measurement windows.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                    A **Push Notification Testing Framework** is a structured way to plan, run, validate, and learn from tests across the entire push lifecycle\u2014copy, targeting, timing, delivery, deep links, and measurement. In **Direct & Retention Marketing**, push notifications are one of the fastest levers for reactivation and conversion, but they are also easy to misfire: the wrong audience, broken links, poor timing, or misleading results can damage trust quickly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10235,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1895],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-push-notification-marketing"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10235"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8326"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8326\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}