{"id":6441,"date":"2026-03-22T23:10:08","date_gmt":"2026-03-22T23:10:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/share-of-search\/"},"modified":"2026-03-22T23:10:08","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T23:10:08","slug":"share-of-search","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/share-of-search\/","title":{"rendered":"Share of Search: What It Is, Key Features, Benefits, Use Cases, and How It Fits in Branding"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Modern marketing teams need signals that show whether their brand is truly becoming the default choice in a category. Share of Search<\/strong> is one of the most useful signals for Brand & Trust<\/strong> because it reflects what people actively seek out\u2014often before they buy, subscribe, recommend, or churn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In practical Branding<\/strong> terms, Share of Search helps answer a deceptively simple question: When customers think about this category, how often do they think of us strongly enough to search for us (or for our products) compared with competitors?<\/em> When tracked consistently, it can reveal early momentum (or early warning signs) that are easy to miss in lagging metrics like revenue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article explains what Share of Search is, how to measure it responsibly, how it fits into Brand & Trust<\/strong> strategy, and how to apply it in real-world Branding<\/strong> work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

What Is Share of Search?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Share of Search<\/strong> is the percentage of total search interest (or search volume) for a defined set of brand-related queries that belongs to your brand compared with competitors over a specific period and market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At its core, it\u2019s a comparative demand signal:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • Your brand\u2019s branded search demand<\/strong><\/li>\n
  • divided by<\/li>\n
  • total branded search demand for the competitive set<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    Business meaning: Share of Search indicates relative brand salience<\/strong>\u2014how strongly your brand comes to mind when people are researching, evaluating, or looking to re-engage. In Brand & Trust<\/strong>, that salience often correlates with perceived credibility, familiarity, and confidence (\u201cI trust this brand enough to look for it by name\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    In Branding<\/strong>, Share of Search is valuable because it bridges brand perception and measurable behavior. People may like<\/em> an ad, but if they don\u2019t search, compare, revisit, or explore, that \u201cawareness\u201d can be shallow. Share of Search helps you quantify whether your brand is earning a larger slice of category attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n\n\n\n

    Why Share of Search Matters in Brand & Trust<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Share of Search<\/strong> matters because it captures active intent<\/em>, not passive exposure. In Brand & Trust<\/strong> work, that difference is critical: trust is rarely built through a single touch; it grows when audiences repeatedly choose to engage with your brand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Key reasons it\u2019s strategically important:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    • Earlier signal than revenue in many categories:<\/strong> People often search before they buy. A sustained lift in Share of Search can appear before pipeline, trials, or sales fully catch up.<\/li>\n
    • Competitive context built in:<\/strong> Many teams track only their own branded search growth. Share of Search shows whether growth is truly outpacing rivals or simply reflecting category expansion.<\/li>\n
    • Supports smarter budget decisions:<\/strong> If performance marketing efficiency declines but Share of Search rises, you may be investing in durable Branding<\/strong> rather than short-term clicks.<\/li>\n
    • Aligns marketing and comms:<\/strong> PR, social, creators, events, and content often influence search behavior. Share of Search gives these channels a common scoreboard for Brand & Trust<\/strong> outcomes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Most importantly, Share of Search helps teams manage brand as an asset. When your share grows steadily, you\u2019re often strengthening mental availability\u2014one of the foundations of effective Branding<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n\n\n\n

      How Share of Search Works<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Share of Search is measured rather than \u201cimplemented,\u201d but it becomes actionable when you operationalize it as a workflow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      1) Input: Define the competitive set and query scope<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      You choose:\n– The brands to include (your brand + relevant competitors)\n– The market and language (country, region, locale)\n– The query definitions (brand names, product lines, common misspellings)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      2) Analysis: Collect and normalize search interest data<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      You gather search data from sources such as:\n– Search trend indices (useful for directionality)\n– Keyword volume estimates (useful for scale)\n– Search console data (useful for your brand\u2019s site performance)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Then you normalize for:\n– Time windows (weekly\/monthly\/quarterly)\n– Seasonality\n– Brand name ambiguity (e.g., brand terms that are also common words)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      3) Application: Interpret changes against real-world drivers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      You connect movement in Share of Search to:\n– Campaign launches, PR hits, influencer pushes\n– Product releases, pricing changes, outages\n– Competitor spend spikes or reputation events<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      This is where Brand & Trust<\/strong> context matters: a spike might reflect positive credibility, or it might reflect a crisis drawing attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      4) Output: Trends, insights, and decisions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Your outputs typically include:\n– Share of Search trend charts by brand\n– Annotated timelines tied to activities\n– Actions: message adjustments, channel rebalancing, content gaps, geo expansion, or competitor conquesting<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Used properly, Share of Search becomes a practical navigation tool for Branding<\/strong> strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n\n\n\n

      Key Components of Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      To make Share of Search<\/strong> reliable, you need more than a chart\u2014you need consistent measurement discipline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Core data inputs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
        \n
      • Branded query sets:<\/strong> brand name, product names, \u201cbrand + category\u201d terms, common variations<\/li>\n
      • Competitor lists:<\/strong> direct competitors, substitutes, and \u201caspirational\u201d category leaders<\/li>\n
      • Market definitions:<\/strong> country\/region, language, device context when relevant<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

        Processes and systems<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
          \n
        • Keyword governance:<\/strong> rules for adding\/removing terms so the metric doesn\u2019t drift over time<\/li>\n
        • Normalization rules:<\/strong> handling seasonality, brand ambiguity, and one-off events<\/li>\n
        • Reporting cadence:<\/strong> weekly for fast-moving categories; monthly\/quarterly for executive decisions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

          Team responsibilities<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
            \n
          • Marketing\/Brand lead:<\/strong> ensures interpretation aligns with Brand & Trust<\/strong> goals<\/li>\n
          • SEO\/Analytics:<\/strong> maintains query sets, validates data quality, explains anomalies<\/li>\n
          • Product\/Comms:<\/strong> provides context (launches, incidents, messaging changes)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

            Measurement integrity checks<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
              \n
            • Are terms truly branded (not generic)?<\/li>\n
            • Are competitor terms comparable in intent?<\/li>\n
            • Are spikes explained by real events?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

              These components keep Share of Search usable for serious Branding<\/strong> decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n\n\n\n

              Types of Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              Share of Search doesn\u2019t have rigid \u201cofficial\u201d types, but in practice, teams use several meaningful distinctions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              1) Branded Share of Search (brand name only)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              Tracks searches for the brand name and close variants. Best for tracking brand salience and Brand & Trust<\/strong> momentum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              2) Brand-plus-intent Share of Search<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              Includes queries like \u201cBrand pricing,\u201d \u201cBrand reviews,\u201d \u201cBrand alternatives,\u201d \u201cBrand login,\u201d or \u201cBrand support.\u201d\n– Useful for diagnosing trust and conversion readiness\n– Risk: can be influenced by support issues or account actions<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              3) Product-line Share of Search<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              Measures interest in specific products under a parent brand (e.g., \u201cProduct A vs Product B\u201d).\n– Useful for portfolio Branding<\/strong> and launch tracking<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              4) Geo or segment-specific Share of Search<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              Split by region, language, or audience segment (where data allows).\n– Useful for expansion and localized Brand & Trust<\/strong> initiatives<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Choosing the right approach depends on what decision you\u2019re trying to make.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n\n\n\n

              Real-World Examples of Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              Example 1: SaaS rebrand and credibility lift<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              A mid-market SaaS company repositions from \u201ctool\u201d to \u201cplatform\u201d and runs a 10-week Branding<\/strong> campaign (PR + thought leadership + product narrative). Paid search efficiency is flat, but Share of Search climbs steadily versus two direct rivals. This supports the conclusion that Brand & Trust<\/strong> is improving, even before revenue accelerates. The team doubles down on the narrative, expands into two adjacent categories, and uses the trend as evidence for a longer-term brand investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Example 2: Retail seasonal spike vs real brand growth<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              A retailer sees a holiday surge in branded search and celebrates. But Share of Search stays flat because competitors rise the same amount. Conclusion: it\u2019s largely seasonal category demand. The next year, they differentiate with a trust-focused promise (shipping reliability + guarantees). Share of Search rises during the same seasonal window, indicating improved competitive preference\u2014stronger Brand & Trust<\/strong> through Branding<\/strong> that reduces buyer risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Example 3: Reputation incident and \u201ccuriosity searches\u201d<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              A consumer brand faces negative press. Branded searches spike, pushing Share of Search up sharply. Without context, this looks like a win. But the query mix shows \u201cbrand scandal\u201d and \u201cbrand refund.\u201d The team uses Share of Search with sentiment and query-intent splits to separate attention from trust. They respond with transparent comms, update policies, and track whether Share of Search stabilizes while negative modifiers decline\u2014restoring Brand & Trust<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n\n\n\n

              Benefits of Using Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              When measured thoughtfully, Share of Search<\/strong> can drive tangible advantages:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                \n
              • Better strategic clarity:<\/strong> You can see whether your brand is gaining ground or merely growing with the market.<\/li>\n
              • More efficient spend allocation:<\/strong> Rising Share of Search can justify continued Branding<\/strong> even when short-term ROAS fluctuates.<\/li>\n
              • Improved competitive awareness:<\/strong> You\u2019ll catch competitor surges earlier\u2014often before you see them in sales results.<\/li>\n
              • Cross-channel accountability:<\/strong> PR, social, creators, and content can contribute to Share of Search, tying \u201cupper funnel\u201d work to measurable outcomes.<\/li>\n
              • Customer experience insights:<\/strong> Increases in \u201cbrand + support\u201d or \u201cbrand + complaints\u201d can reveal trust friction and product issues affecting Brand & Trust<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                \n\n\n\n

                Challenges of Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                Share of Search is powerful, but it\u2019s not foolproof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Measurement and data limitations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                  \n
                • Search data is sampled or estimated:<\/strong> Trend indices and volume tools are directional, not perfect counts.<\/li>\n
                • Brand ambiguity:<\/strong> Brands that share names with common words or other entities can distort the metric.<\/li>\n
                • Walled-garden behavior:<\/strong> Some discovery happens inside social platforms, marketplaces, or apps, not search engines.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                  Strategic risks<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                    \n
                  • Confusing attention with trust:<\/strong> Crises can inflate Share of Search for the wrong reasons.<\/li>\n
                  • Over-crediting one channel:<\/strong> A lift may result from PR, word-of-mouth, or offline activity\u2014not just SEO or ads.<\/li>\n
                  • Ignoring the competitive set:<\/strong> Adding\/removing competitors changes the denominator and can create misleading comparisons.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                    Implementation barriers<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                      \n
                    • Governance takes effort: keyword sets, markets, and timeframes must remain consistent to support long-term Branding<\/strong> decisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                      \n\n\n\n

                      Best Practices for Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                      Use these practices to make Share of Search<\/strong> a dependable Brand & Trust<\/strong> metric.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                        \n
                      1. \n

                        Define \u201cbrand queries\u201d rigorously<\/strong>\n – Include misspellings and product names where appropriate\n – Exclude generic category terms unless you\u2019re explicitly measuring something else<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                      2. \n

                        Keep the competitive set stable<\/strong>\n – Review quarterly, not weekly\n – Document why brands are included\/excluded<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                      3. \n

                        Track trends, not single points<\/strong>\n – Use rolling averages to smooth volatility\n – Annotate charts with launches, PR moments, outages, and major promotions<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                      4. \n

                        Segment by intent when possible<\/strong>\n – Separate \u201cbrand navigational\u201d (login, site, app) from \u201cbrand evaluative\u201d (reviews, pricing, alternatives)\n – This is crucial for interpreting Brand & Trust<\/strong> movement<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                      5. \n

                        Use Share of Search alongside outcome metrics<\/strong>\n – Pair with pipeline, conversion rate, retention, and NPS\/CSAT where applicable\n – For Branding<\/strong>, also track message recall or brand lift studies when available<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                      6. \n

                        Create an action loop<\/strong>\n – Decide in advance what changes trigger actions (e.g., if Share of Search drops for 6 weeks, audit competitor activity and refresh messaging)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                        \n\n\n\n

                        Tools Used for Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                        Share of Search is typically assembled from multiple tool categories rather than a single system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          \n
                        • SEO tools:<\/strong> keyword discovery, competitive keyword volume estimates, SERP monitoring for branded terms<\/li>\n
                        • Search trend tools:<\/strong> time-series indices to compare brand interest directionally<\/li>\n
                        • Analytics tools:<\/strong> landing page and channel behavior to see what happens after branded searches<\/li>\n
                        • Search console data:<\/strong> your site\u2019s impressions and clicks for branded queries (excellent for your brand, limited for competitor visibility)<\/li>\n
                        • Reporting dashboards:<\/strong> consistent executive views, annotations, and segmented reporting by region or product line<\/li>\n
                        • CRM and marketing automation:<\/strong> connects Share of Search movement to lead quality, pipeline velocity, and retention\u2014critical for proving Branding<\/strong> impact on Brand & Trust<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                          The goal isn\u2019t to obsess over one \u201cperfect\u201d number; it\u2019s to build a repeatable measurement system that stays consistent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                          \n\n\n\n

                          Metrics Related to Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                          To interpret Share of Search<\/strong> correctly, pair it with complementary indicators:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                            \n
                          • Branded search volume (absolute):<\/strong> tells you scale; Share of Search tells you competitiveness<\/li>\n
                          • Share of Voice (media\/ad):<\/strong> compares exposure; Share of Search compares demand\/interest<\/li>\n
                          • Direct traffic trend:<\/strong> often correlates with brand familiarity but can be noisy due to attribution issues<\/li>\n
                          • Conversion rate on branded landing pages:<\/strong> indicates whether searchers trust what they find<\/li>\n
                          • Pipeline and revenue mix from branded vs non-branded:<\/strong> shows whether brand is pulling demand rather than renting it<\/li>\n
                          • Repeat purchase \/ retention rate:<\/strong> validates that Brand & Trust<\/strong> is translating into loyalty<\/li>\n
                          • Sentiment and review ratings:<\/strong> helps distinguish positive interest from negative attention<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                            Together, these create a more complete Branding<\/strong> performance picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                            \n\n\n\n

                            Future Trends of Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                            Several shifts are changing how Share of Search will be used within Brand & Trust<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                              \n
                            • AI-assisted discovery:<\/strong> As more users get answers from AI interfaces, search behavior may shift from keyword queries to conversational prompts. Share of Search will likely evolve to include broader \u201cshare of intent\u201d signals across surfaces.<\/li>\n
                            • Automation and anomaly detection:<\/strong> Teams will increasingly use automated monitoring to flag unusual Share of Search changes and connect them to PR, outages, or competitor activity.<\/li>\n
                            • Privacy and measurement constraints:<\/strong> Reduced granularity in some platforms will increase reliance on aggregated trends, making governance and consistency even more important.<\/li>\n
                            • Personalization and fragmentation:<\/strong> As audiences discover brands via communities, creators, and marketplaces, practitioners will pair Share of Search with platform-native interest signals to understand holistic Branding<\/strong> momentum.<\/li>\n
                            • Better segmentation by intent:<\/strong> Expect more emphasis on query clustering (\u201creviews,\u201d \u201cpricing,\u201d \u201cjobs,\u201d \u201csupport\u201d) to interpret Brand & Trust<\/strong> changes with less ambiguity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                              Share of Search will remain valuable, but teams will treat it as one pillar of a broader brand demand measurement stack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                              \n\n\n\n

                              Share of Search vs Related Terms<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                              Share of Search vs Share of Voice<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                \n
                              • Share of Voice<\/strong> measures how much exposure you generate (ads, media mentions, impressions).<\/li>\n
                              • Share of Search<\/strong> measures how much demand and curiosity your brand captures relative to competitors.\nIn Branding<\/strong>, Share of Voice can be a leading input; Share of Search is often a stronger signal of earned attention and Brand & Trust<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                                Share of Search vs Branded Search Volume<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                  \n
                                • Branded search volume<\/strong> is your absolute demand.<\/li>\n
                                • Share of Search<\/strong> is your demand relative to the competitive set<\/em>.\nA brand can grow in volume but lose Share of Search if competitors grow faster.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                                  Share of Search vs Market Share<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                    \n
                                  • Market share<\/strong> reflects actual sales outcomes.<\/li>\n
                                  • Share of Search<\/strong> reflects attention and intent signals that may lead sales.\nShare of Search can move sooner, making it useful for steering Brand & Trust<\/strong> and Branding<\/strong> decisions before financial results are fully visible.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                    \n\n\n\n

                                    Who Should Learn Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                      \n
                                    • Marketers:<\/strong> to connect Branding<\/strong> activity to measurable demand signals and guide channel mix.<\/li>\n
                                    • Analysts:<\/strong> to build reliable competitive dashboards, normalization rules, and insight narratives.<\/li>\n
                                    • Agencies:<\/strong> to demonstrate brand impact beyond short-term performance metrics and to defend strategic investment in Brand & Trust<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
                                    • Business owners and founders:<\/strong> to understand whether the brand is becoming a category default and to anticipate competitive threats.<\/li>\n
                                    • Developers and data teams:<\/strong> to automate data pipelines, maintain governance, and integrate Share of Search trends with internal BI and CRM systems.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                      \n\n\n\n

                                      Summary of Share of Search<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                      Share of Search<\/strong> measures your brand\u2019s portion of branded search interest versus competitors across a defined market and timeframe. It matters because it reflects active demand and brand salience\u2014two essentials of Brand & Trust<\/strong>. Used well, it strengthens Branding<\/strong> decisions by revealing whether attention is shifting toward your brand, why it\u2019s happening, and what actions to take next. The key is consistency: stable query sets, clear competitor definitions, and interpretation grounded in real business context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      \n\n\n\n

                                      Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                                      1) What is Share of Search and what does it tell me?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      Share of Search is your brand\u2019s percentage of total branded search interest within a defined competitor set. It tells you whether your brand is gaining or losing relative mindshare and demand compared with rivals\u2014often a useful signal for Brand & Trust<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      2) Is Share of Search a leading indicator of sales?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      It can be, especially in categories where customers research before buying. But it\u2019s not guaranteed. Treat Share of Search as a directional demand and salience metric, then validate with pipeline, conversion, and retention results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      3) How do I choose the right competitors for Share of Search?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      Pick brands that customers genuinely consider as alternatives. Keep the set stable, document changes, and avoid inflating results by excluding strong rivals. Consistency is essential for credible Branding<\/strong> insights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      4) Should I include \u201cbrand + reviews\u201d and \u201cbrand + pricing\u201d terms?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      Often yes, because those queries reflect evaluation and trust-building behavior. For Brand & Trust<\/strong> analysis, it\u2019s best to segment them so you can distinguish navigational searches from evaluative searches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      5) Can Share of Search be misleading?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      Yes. A PR crisis can increase branded searches without improving trust. Also, ambiguous brand names and changing competitor sets can distort the metric. Pair it with sentiment and intent splits to avoid false conclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      6) How often should I report Share of Search?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      Weekly is useful for fast-moving categories or active campaigns; monthly works well for executives and long-term Branding<\/strong> strategy. The key is a consistent cadence with annotated events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                                      7) How does Share of Search support Branding work specifically?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                                      It helps quantify whether Branding<\/strong> efforts are increasing brand preference and mental availability. If your Share of Search rises steadily against competitors, you\u2019re often building stronger Brand & Trust<\/strong> that can improve performance efficiency over time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                      Modern marketing teams need signals that show whether their brand is truly becoming the default choice in a category. **Share of Search** is one of the most useful signals for **Brand & Trust** because it reflects what people actively seek out\u2014often before they buy, subscribe, recommend, or churn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10235,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1883],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-branding"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10235"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wizbrand.com\/tutorials\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}